Elme Messer Women`s Baltic League 25/26

Elme Messer Women`s Baltic League 25/26

Elme Messer Women`s Baltic League 25/26 Best players LIBERO
PlayerPlayedReceptionRanking
  MatchesSets#=!/-+TotRc ind.Rc ind.Index

1

Kramena Kristine
(RSU)

4

14

22

1

2

0

20

14

59

0.5932

0.5932

0.30367

2

Rutkauskaite Rusne
(Kaunas-VDU)

14

44

42

18

10

5

47

48

170

0.3941

0.3941

0.30311

3

Kliauz Daniele
(VMSM Sostinės tauras - VTC)

13

48

42

29

8

9

59

79

226

0.3673

0.3673

0.30303

4

Tamm Liisa
(TÜ/Bigbank)

3

13

18

15

5

2

23

21

84

0.2619

0.2619

0.30273

5

Tatrik Lisandra
(Rae Spordikool/VIASTON)

11

36

41

13

21

12

43

24

154

0.2597

0.2597

0.30273

6

Krumholce Alvīne
(RSU)

9

31

66

35

12

12

58

34

217

0.2442

0.2442

0.30268

7

Gasiūnaitė Vaiva
(LTU U18)

15

53

40

31

23

18

74

72

258

0.2442

0.2442

0.30268

8

Kangro Kadri
(TÜ/Bigbank)

9

33

27

13

30

10

50

36

166

0.241

0.241

0.30267

9

Miloslavska Eva Elizabete
(LAT U18 / RVS)

13

45

41

38

22

24

72

67

264

0.1742

0.1742

0.30248

10

Antson Laura
(Audentese SG)

8

27

16

12

24

16

59

36

163

0.1472

0.1472

0.30241

11

Jurkevičiūtė Skaistė
(LTU U18)

3

4

1

1

2

1

12

4

21

0.1429

0.1429

0.30239

12

Putene Rūta
(Riga Volleyball School/LU)

9

36

12

16

27

6

50

26

137

0.1168

0.1168

0.30232

13

Koik Gertu
(Audentese SG)

12

32

37

36

19

13

64

30

199

0.0905

0.0905

0.30225

14

Baratashvili Elene
(Rae Spordikool/VIASTON)

9

21

18

15

6

10

41

16

106

0.0849

0.0849

0.30223

15

Põldma Liisa
(TÜ/Bigbank)

1

4

0

5

3

1

4

2

15

-0.2667

-0.2667

0.30124

Ranking Calculation

Libero

the ranking takes into account:

  • Reception Index (Rc ind.): positive receptions minus negative receptions divided the total receptions

The Skill is “weighted” multiplying the index with a specific coefficients per skill and per role and successively multiplied with another coefficient which determines the impact of the libero role on the game, in other words the importance of the role towards the win probability.

Filters applied

  • Minimum number of Matches played:  1

  • Minimum number of Receptions per set:  3